Natalie Angier is an American nonfiction writer and a science journalist for The New York Times Video: Natalie Angier – The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science (May 16, Panel discussion with Neil Turok, Michael D. Griffin, Nadia El-Awady and Stewart Brand, at the Quantum to Cosmos festival. Editorial Reviews. From Publishers Weekly. Science is underappreciated and undervalued in a The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful Basics of Science – Kindle edition by Natalie Angier. Download it once and read it on your Kindle. Natalie Angier, a science writer for the New York Times, has written a wonderful book called The Canon: A Whirligig Tour of the Beautiful.

Author: Malara Disida
Country: China
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 17 November 2016
Pages: 66
PDF File Size: 19.37 Mb
ePub File Size: 3.22 Mb
ISBN: 594-3-64218-706-5
Downloads: 92200
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fenrinos

Natalie Angier is composed of 4 names. I’d never thought about it that way before.

Book Review: The Canon by Natalie Angier | SPANISH INQUISITOR

Therefore, I’m going to patronizingly write the rest of this review in Angier’s style to drive the point home. The chapter on evolution is an impassioned plea for reason that holds an cahon anthropological significance for the British reader. I hate not finishing books, but this one was so irritating it started to make me angry. It held my interest which otherwise would have flagged. Natalie Angier writes wonderful columns which frequently appear in the New York Times.

Use of the latter is a very good way to get across to the lay reader the nuances of a highly technical matter in a way they may more readily comprehend. I thought that e author also did a great job of presenting all those basics that I somehow couldn’t understand all along. She should e, gone a little easier on the lit dust when it wasn’t being used in a particularly helpful way.

Review: The Canon by Natalie Angier | Books | The Guardian

I Agree This site uses cookies to deliver our services, improve performance, for analytics, and if not signed in for advertising. If the author had pulled out 99 percent of the jokes and anger and filled in that space with genuine prose, rich imagery, and flowery anecdotes, the book would have benefited greatly from it.

Angier gets a C for effort – many interesting topics are considered and there were a number of thought-provoking passages. By way of example I give you this gem from page”Perhaps nothing underscores carbon’s chemical genius better than the breadth of its packaging options, from the dark, slippery, shavable format of graphite on one extreme, to fossilized starlight on the other- translucent, mesmeric, intransigent diamond, the hardest substance known, save for a human heart grown cold.


Natalie Angier Author of The Canon: It wasn’t all bad, though. The cajon were so littered with random metaphors and references that I found them to be distracting canom than further illuminating of her point.

Since I do have something of a scientific background, and I did not flunk my high school chemistry, I found the book rather tedious, and sometimes more than a little dull – amid all the jokes, that is.

This needn’t be a bad thing, but the writer’s presentation is meandering and counterproductive. University of Michigan Barnard College.

Me reading this book was like a fish going to a lecture about why water is sl. By all means, could we focus on the basics of science, and leave the hammering of morals natalid some other book?

I believe Angier was trying to make the book user-friendly for the science-phobes, but these efforts fell flat and were far too prevalent. Angier is a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who concentrates on explaining science to the masses — us.

Sigue al autor

Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. But what we laymen and laywomen consider complex pales in comparison to the vast body of knowledge that we call science. You can examine and separate out names. Dec 10, Chelsea rated it it was ok Shelves: The entire idea of the book is to teach science and yet I found myself floundering in a rant about how more people should just learn science and go into science and people really need to start valuing science and for god’s sake why can’t anyone see that I’M RIGHT Basically, just don’t read it.

It’s not that the jokes are all bad; no, some of them are moderately clever, many of them made me at least smile. I might not have had as much of a problem with it had I felt like she intended to Perhaps I hated this book because I have a science background.

Natalle short, if you actually know anything about science, don’t read this book. Angier has some fun turning a good phrase here and there. After reading this book, I want to dive straight into the s in my local Dewey Decimal-organized library and come out in maybe ten years. But, really, this is not my biggest quibble with the book. What sort of texts every scientist must have read? It might just be me who feels bitchy after reading a few pages.

Science maintains its outsider status not by means of a conspiracy against its nerdiness, but because, as its advocate readily enthuses, it is big, unwieldy, impossible to pin down. Image courtesy of Natalie Angier. At first Ell found the chattiness to be slightly off-putting, but when I caonn to the chapters on material that I didn’t know much about molecular bio The Canon is exactly what its subtitle says: I loved cotton candy, and only got it once a year at the county fair.

  IC CD4013 PDF

She devotes many pages to the busy activity inside every cell, ranging from protein synthesis to cell division to communication with other cells.

Nine out of ten camon I said paragraphs, not pages or chapters ends with an exhausting colloquialism, contrived personal experience or mixed metaphor. The author isn’t a scientist so she can still see complex topics from the layman’s viewpoint.

Amazon Music Transmite millones de canciones. I don’t see how any adult can possibly not feel like a second grader while reading this.


It would be valuable if these stylistic stutters were better thought out or perhaps just better spread out across this accursed anthology. Angier so ably and entertainingly covers in this slim — under pages — volume is the scientific method, probabilities, physics, chemistry, biology, geology, and astronomy.

I read a few of the other chapters, but not the whole thing, because that’s as much as I wanted to know; and that worked fine, which is another good thing about this book.

The Pulitzer Prize-winning science journalist and author of Woman draws on interviews with hundreds of the world’s top scientists to offer an entertaining guide to scientific literacy, exploring the fundamental principles of the major scientific disciplines of physics, chemistry, biology, geology, and astronomy and their link to the world around us. Angier is thorough a lot more so than I expected going into this and accessible, and while some chapters covered more familiar ground than others, I felt I got something from each of them.

In all, a good way to bring the science fearful into a basic understanding that could be nurtured into interest or even love. She gives the impression, through her word choices, that she isn’t trying to have a conversation with the reader, so much as impress them with all the SAT words she knows.

Science cannot be accessed in this way. The chapter on physics made my day; the chemistry chapter would have made last year’s science class much more interesting; the astronomy chapter was a tad belabored, though no amount of repetition will ever make “we are stardust” un-awe-inspiring.

Her tools are a talent for clear and concise description, wl with a reliance on effective metaphor.